Thanks for your input Deborah!
OK, although new understandings are included, META-Health is not limited to "new understandings" but also older ones are included. Or should we write "contemporary science" and "therapeutic experience"? Because presenting it as an argument "against the claim of quackery", individual personal experience means "nothing substantial". We are referring to the coaching and therapeutic experiences of our practitioners, documented in case studies.

Bio__-__logical understanding is a term putting meanings together, I love it, but the term is not one commonly used, other than "biological understanding", which is used with a much broader meaning.

The intention of this statement is to clarify for any mainstream audience including critics, what META-Health represents and what not, so we want to avoid "our" jargon and rather use "theirs" :-)

How about this summary:
"META-Health is an integrative holistic approach to healthcare based on contemporary science and experience in coaching and therapy. ''META-Health International'' consists of Practitioners and Trainers all over the world.
A Code of Practice is binding for all who work with META-Health.

The concept and practice of META-Health is based on neuroscience and psychosomatic, "bio-logical" understanding. It does not include a specific stance regarding any therapeutic or preventive practice, nor does it have any specific political or religious views.

''MHI'' supports Practitioners with communication platforms, cooperation and mediation. However, each Practitioner is responsible for their own practice and their communication."

.