After the very constructive online meeting on feb 26, 2018 I feel it is necessary that we define what META-Health is, clearly distinguishing it from GNM or even from META-Medicine, from which it evolved.
This is how META-Health is presented on IMMA's public website now: [https://www.meta-health.info/meta-health/|read here] and about the [https://www.meta-health.info/meta-health/basic-principles/|Basic Principles]

Moreover "biological conflicts" like in UDIN moments, the connected emotions and beliefs are mentioned which is different from GNM teachings.
For me (and I think, Robert who coined the name will agree to that), META-Health is not a mere analysis tool anymore, but encompasses a methodology to use for consciousness and self-healing. To chunk them up:
*__root-cause analysis__ including epigenetics
*__multifactorial analysis__ including conflict patterns and environmental circumstances
*__tools from neuroscience__ (neuroplasticity makes belief change, reframing, reimprinting possible - these are methods we use as practitioners)
*__tools from embodiment__ and mindfulness (connecting felt sense with emotions and memories or symbols)
*__motivational tools__ (values work, goalsetting, envisioning/manifesting)
*__individual symptomatic help__ and lifestyle recommendations, based on the analysis and process

The modalities we can use for this are many, and META-Health is not about specific methods but about the goals they achieve.
(META-Health trainings however, especially in Level 3 (Master P) can/should provide some methods, at least an introduction to them.)

Do you think this is transported in the text on the website (click above links to compare) sufficiently?
Are there any changes or additions you would like to see?