Hi Kora and Thorsten

While I agree with you both that I would like more people to engage with META-Health globally as that certainly benefits humanity

I don't agree with the concept that it's just a case of greater numbers of people speaking with enthusiasm

When we look at the growth of any new field or modality there are usually only a few people with a coherent message and high degree of competency that are able to demonstrate practically the theories that are being extolled

In the past it was Johannes idea that we just needed to increase the numbers of people talking to get the word out so to speak and that was his idea of a growth strategy but certainly not mine

The result is clear and it's where we find ourselves today with the statistics that you demonstrate Thorsten there seems to be a problem with engagement more systemically 

With no coherent communication strategy or quality standards in place about who should or can speak i feel this has had an opposing affect in fact possibly even stifled the growth of META-Health internationally

So it's complex situation we all find ourselves in no doubt

My question is really, is it simply just a case of increasing the numbers of people talking about the approach key to a successful growth strategy?

The answer is evident

There is a saying in England too many chiefs and not enough Indians

Speakers are seen by the general public in a similar way to authors I.e. as experts

When someone starts to speak about a subject in public people assume (rightly or wrongly) that this makes them an expert in their chosen field

The big problem with this is that then people make assumptions about the whole field and the other trainers representatives etc... based on that persons communication they can't help it it's how western culture currently operates

this is something I feel very uncomfortable about, that somebody speaking elsewhere in the world is actually representing me when I have had no input into their development or know how their being evaluated or to what standards etc...

Thorsten, you raise valuable questions about how can we standardise or make scientific this holistic health concept with such a small case study basis

Also how do we proceed in terms of growth and becoming an integrated part of health care rather than alternative niche

The question about science is an interesting one because there actually two different sciences were working with which don't normally sit together

One sits in the materialistic camp and has a biological basis and is the basis for Dr Hamer's observations as we know - this is seen to be objective 

The power lays in the application of this understanding through META-Health Analysis

which is about how we enquire into the aspects of the unconscious which relate, create and maintain dis-ease processing or we could say how we help reveal where someone is stuck in their own evolutionary processing - this can be seen as subjective enquiry

from conducting talks for over 10 years it is clear to me that differences in sign up rates for foundation weekends come down to being able to conduct effective demonstrations where we can show that the model we're trying to explain is accurate by someone reaction to an enquiry

So the question of how we grow META-Health globally is simple it's making sure that speakers can demonstrate effectively most of the time

The question of how we get taken seriously by mainstream alternative medicine or health care is a bigger and more complex one as the philosophical and scientific basis behind this field is systems and cybernetics and this is a relatively new set of constructs requiring a greater engagement with complexity,

Which is another reason META-Health isn't growing as quickly as things such as EFT etc...

Because it's a very complex system by comparison

You can't simplify complex systems that's been the whole problem with the reductionist Approach to medicine and is why clinical medicine is in a mess the world over, because they tried to treat the organism as a machine and it simply doesn't work or when it appears to there are always unintended consequences because a lack of understanding of the complex cause effect relationships involved

Look forward to discussing all this in more depth

Love to all