All proposals include __"empowering the world"__, so I assume we keep that.

I question "sharing the scientific understanding of nature's path", because basically, every nature science shares it's understanding, but this is not describing what we do (and we don't teach nature science). Besides that, "nature's path" implies to me living and dying, eating and being eaten. Although this may belong to our understanding as well, it is not what META-Health is about to me.

I am fine with leaving the term "salutogenesis" to another part of the IMMA site where we explain our scientific bases and approach.

I find instead "sharing ideas which support human health and wellbeing" concise and true.

I find it in the Mission statement more important to name IMMA as organization for public benefit (as is stated in her bylaws), because this can appeal more to potential donators.

Together, this could sound like:
__"IMMA, as organization for public benefit, is empowering the world to self-heal by sharing ideas which support human health and wellbeing."__

The following why, how and what must then be more precise about the ideas and the sharing.