Some aspects for the discussion from my point of view as COO:

!!What's the base for our standards?

From my point of view META-Health is a concept of understanding human health. Originally it's a fork of Dr. Hamer's New Medicine. From Dr. Hamer's part most of the client cases are not accessable for the public. IMMA itself has a database of only 720 client cases collected within 13 years (saved from the attacked server). 

On a scientific level: How can we standardize a holistic health concept on this base? Do we have enough understandable case studies of good quality for the proof of the pudding - giving us the plausibility to develop standards? 

!!What about spreading the new healing paradigm?

Regarding a membership of only 350 persons IMMA seems to be still in the embryonic state although already in her 14th year. Nearly all our MTs seem to be fully employed with their own businesses, now and then "forgetting" to name META-Health at all. Shall META-Health continue to be a niche of controversial alternative medicine? Or do we want it to grow to become a relevant part of health care - integrating similar concepts of body mind relations? Which effect will the proposed standards for META-S, META-T and META-MT have?