A couple of things 

The MH Practitioner Evaluation document and guidance notes for trainers which I created with Joanne in 2011 and was given to Johannes In Egypt 2013 was not based around evaluating a 12 question process.  It was developed around examining students according to their competence at META-Health Analysis methodology also which I developed.

This cant be reduced to a simple 12 question process. The evaluation document was designed to support us (Master Trainers) to evaluate a practitioners competence in obtaining key/critical information via assessing their questioning and decision making ability during a META-Health Analysis.  So it was really designed as a way of assessing META-Health Intelligence and practitioner methodology 

Secondly the marking Schema for the document has been altered so that the document doesn't work as it was originally intended and subsequently removes the scope for the Master Trainer being able to give and take marks away for good or poor performance in a specific areas of assessment. Its become restrictive for example I work with a marking Schema of 200 marks with a specific spread across certain criteria which allows greater emphasis to be placed in some areas rather than others which I feel is important to mention.

Silly really this is what happens when you take the document away from the developer with no discussion of or understanding of how it has been put together or why things have been structured in the way that they have.  That document took a long time for Joanne and myself to develop and when used correctly can be a very useful tool when assessing the competence of a META-Health Practitioner