I think, a thesis should be checked for
1. Compliance with the concept of Dr Hamer's findings - are assumptions made that want to be discussed?
2. Compliance with anatomy and physiology - are assumptions made that want to be discussed?
3. What new insights are found forwarding META-Health?
4. Is evidence provided that supports the thesis (own or others' case examples)?

Please comment or add your own ideas, so we find a working structure to evaluate the submitted material.