I like your form as it gives more scope choosing between 0-5 to 20 points - we could adopt that!

My view is that we should avoid to give points arbitrarily (Master Trainer's assessment) as this is where it gets subjective. Our own assessment (how we perceive the student in the training/exercises) leads us to recommend for the student to be examined in the first place! 

For IMMA use, as we are looking for __core standards__, MTs might alter certain points where they use different terms and priorities. Or __does everybody agree with Robert's wording__?

As we teach / introduce emotional release and basic transformatory tools, do we want to have them in the assessment form for level 2?

As chunk-up, __can we agree on the standards above named or the altered version worked out in the MT meeting__?